Southern Baptists Denounce IVF Technology as "Unbiblical"

At their annual convention held in Anaheim, California, the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC), the largest Protestant denomination in the United States, has voted overwhelmingly to oppose the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) technology. The motion, which passed with a 90% majority, marks a significant step in the SBC's evolving stance on assisted reproductive technologies.

Foundation in Scriptural Principles

The SBC's resolution against IVF is rooted in biblical principles and a belief that human life begins at conception. The resolution states, "The intentional creation of human embryos in vitro for any purpose, including implantation in a woman's uterus, violates the sanctity of human life." The motion also condemns the "destruction or discarding of human embryos" created through IVF procedures.

Ethical Concerns

Beyond the theological concerns, the SBC also highlighted ethical dilemmas associated with IVF. The resolution raises questions about the potential for "selective reduction" of embryos based on factors such as genetic abnormalities or gender preference. Additionally, the SBC expressed concerns about the "commercialization" of IVF and the potential for exploiting women and embryos.

Alternative Options

While opposing IVF, the SBC resolution encourages adoption as an alternative path for families seeking to expand. The resolution affirms "the biblical mandate to care for orphans and vulnerable children" and urges churches "to support and participate in adoption and foster care ministries."

Impact on Assisted Reproduction

The SBC's decision is likely to have a significant impact on the assisted reproduction industry in the United States. Many faith-based hospitals and healthcare providers affiliated with the SBC may reconsider offering IVF services. The resolution could also influence public funding for IVF and the availability of insurance coverage for the procedure.

Reactions and Perspectives

The SBC's anti-IVF stance has been met with mixed reactions. Supporters of the resolution applaud the SBC for defending the sanctity of life and for challenging the "slippery slope" of assisted reproductive technologies. Critics, however, argue that the SBC's decision is an infringement on personal autonomy and reproductive rights. They contend that IVF can be a valuable tool for couples struggling with infertility and that it should remain a personal decision.

Historical Context

The SBC's stance on assisted reproductive technologies has evolved over time. In the early 2000s, the SBC expressed some openness to IVF in cases of infertility, but with ethical safeguards. However, in recent years, the SBC has taken a more conservative approach, culminating in the current resolution against IVF.

Conclusion

The Southern Baptist Convention's opposition to IVF technology is a significant development that reflects the denomination's deep-seated beliefs about the sanctity of life and the appropriate use of reproductive technologies. The resolution is likely to have a substantial impact on the assisted reproduction industry and on the wider debate about the ethics of reproductive medicine.